Skip to content

DATAREDIS-661 - Refactor RedisServerCommands.getConfig(…) output to Properties. #255

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

mp911de
Copy link
Member

@mp911de mp911de commented Jul 14, 2017

Use Properties instead of List of Strings arranged as sequence of key-value pairs to improve value lookup. Properties allows direct value lookup whereas the List previously required List scanning for an index and another index access to retrieve the actual value.


Related ticket: DATAREDIS-661.

mp911de added 2 commits July 14, 2017 13:59
…roperties.

Use Properties instead of List of Strings arranged as sequence of key-value pairs to improve value lookup. Properties allows direct value lookup whereas the List previously required List scanning for an index and another index access to retrieve the actual value.
christophstrobl pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 18, 2017
…roperties.

Use Properties instead of List of Strings arranged as sequence of key-value pairs to improve value lookup. Properties allows direct value lookup whereas the List previously required List scanning for an index and another index access to retrieve the actual value.

Original Pull Request: #255
christophstrobl added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 18, 2017
Update JavaDoc and remove usage of MapUtils brought in via optional transitive dependency.

Original Pull Request: #255
@christophstrobl christophstrobl deleted the issue/DATAREDIS-661 branch July 18, 2017 12:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants